I was wondering that as well. They don't seem to mention, which could be a protective measure in either case (if its not, don't draw attention to the fact that there is another currently not detained leaker; if it is, limit the scope of what we know he leaked (has wikileaks itself ever mentioned Manning?)).
They have mentioned him, but they've said that due to the way their system works it is impossible for them to know who their informants are. Therefore their statements are always hedged with things like "the alleged source of such and such".
Comments
I was wondering that as well. They don't seem to mention, which could be a protective measure in either case (if its not, don't draw attention to the fact that there is another currently not detained leaker; if it is, limit the scope of what we know he leaked (has wikileaks itself ever mentioned Manning?)).
has wikileaks itself ever mentioned Manning
They have mentioned him, but they've said that due to the way their system works it is impossible for them to know who their informants are. Therefore their statements are always hedged with things like "the alleged source of such and such".