Amazon's storage costs seem to be more directly marketed as the cost to store files, not to store music files. In terms of direct competitors in the web-based file storage offerings, Google Docs / file storage seems to be a fairly close one, if you ignore the music playback capability.
Since the music playback capability it just an add-on to the file storage aspect, it seems reasonable to compare them to me.
Comments
What does this refer to anyway? The word Google appears nowhere else in the post, what is their cloud music service with this pricing?
Amazon's storage costs seem to be more directly marketed as the cost to store files, not to store music files. In terms of direct competitors in the web-based file storage offerings, Google Docs / file storage seems to be a fairly close one, if you ignore the music playback capability.
Since the music playback capability it just an add-on to the file storage aspect, it seems reasonable to compare them to me.