The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (May 2019)
Any editor is able to edit any article on Wikipedia.
For all it matters, it might have been you who tagged the article as non-neutral.
Additionally, non-neutral does not mean "full of shit". It just means someone feels that the facts listed in the article, albeit undisputed, might have been presented with a tone that they personally feel is not the right one (i.e., doesn't match their personal opinion or how they personally feel about the ordeal).
Comments
Why cite a page that admits its full of shit?
Any editor is able to edit any article on Wikipedia.
For all it matters, it might have been you who tagged the article as non-neutral.
Additionally, non-neutral does not mean "full of shit". It just means someone feels that the facts listed in the article, albeit undisputed, might have been presented with a tone that they personally feel is not the right one (i.e., doesn't match their personal opinion or how they personally feel about the ordeal).
I was only citing it so that you would be aware of where people are getting their misinformation so you could fix it with your superior information.