Skip to content

Comment on Jack Sharp works of amateur photographer circa 1950-1970parent

Comments

And it's super cheap!

From what I could gather they are digitally printed, honest question: knowing this do you still consider it cheap?

Yes, because it's still a striking piece of art.

Also I would not expect anything but a digital print in this day and age, if it's not advertised to be a traditional print. If one is lucky (my preference) it's still a digital print but on wet paper, i.e. Fuji Crystal Archive or Kodak Endura, but the photographic paper is exposed with LED or laser.

A black and white traditional darkroom print is labour intensive and usually goes for much more money.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.