Between this sitting-is-death and the sugar-is-death piece, there should be tens of millions of dead office workers who died before 60 in the past few decades.
Since social security is in trouble, I'd venture a guess there are plenty of people making it to 65?
Instead of torturing lab rats they should give us quantitative factual numbers about how many office workers are now dead from sugar and sitting.
I'm not saying these studies are wrong, I am saying someone is either exaggerating or not providing what should be easy real-world examples.
Comments
Between this sitting-is-death and the sugar-is-death piece, there should be tens of millions of dead office workers who died before 60 in the past few decades.
Since social security is in trouble, I'd venture a guess there are plenty of people making it to 65?
Instead of torturing lab rats they should give us quantitative factual numbers about how many office workers are now dead from sugar and sitting.
I'm not saying these studies are wrong, I am saying someone is either exaggerating or not providing what should be easy real-world examples.
Causation doesn't reveal her bosom willingly.
Answer why Japan lives two years long on average, than the US and the UK, and you could help a lot of people:
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=sp_dyn_le...