I found the final words of the interview the most striking:
>>This is not fair... What are you doing?... This is a national security issue.
A national security issue for who? The US? Can't journalists ask questions about national security issues anymore?
I can see why the US would be weary to have business people/officials traveling to a country where all their conversations can be monitored. But is this a CEO confirmation that the RIM india/pakistan issue has become a US national security issue now?
A gag order would be perfect cause for this rather strange interview-stopping behavior from someone I reckon has a lot of experience dealing with journalists.
Comments
I found the final words of the interview the most striking:
>>This is not fair... What are you doing?... This is a national security issue.
A national security issue for who? The US? Can't journalists ask questions about national security issues anymore?
I can see why the US would be weary to have business people/officials traveling to a country where all their conversations can be monitored. But is this a CEO confirmation that the RIM india/pakistan issue has become a US national security issue now?
A gag order would be perfect cause for this rather strange interview-stopping behavior from someone I reckon has a lot of experience dealing with journalists.
I assumed he meant it was a security issue within the nations the interviewer was asking about, not the US.
But RIM is a Canadian company.