Skip to content

Comment on How Dropbox sacrifices user privacy for cost savings parent

Comments

> If Dropbox can skip the upload process of some large file because another user has already uploaded it, they must also be able to decrypt that file in order to sync it with your other machines.

Not necessarily. The client could send an encrypted version with only (plaintext) hashes of the pieces. EDIT: no, I'm wrong.

> Or in order for you to download it through the web interface unencrypted.

This one I will give you, unless they're doing something really weird like client side decryption through Javascript, which I'm not sure is even possible. However, they could in theory not store the key until you actually use the web interface (and you don't have to, so they wouldn't have it), and also not store the key when you do.

I don't follow. How could the client send an encrypted version of a very large file using only 16 KB on the network?

Yes, you're right. Sorry.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.