I was a computer science student in undergrad and grad school. None of the CS undergrad curriculums I was involved with (either as a student or as a TA) had this level of architecture for undergrad CS majors.
PH or HP? My intro course used Computer Organization and Design, and the senior course used Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (both are by the same authors).
Wow, didn't even realize the two authors had written two books on the subject. I meant the former and hadn't realized the parent of my post meant the latter, having not read the title after seeing the authors' names. Whoops!
Comments
I was a computer science student in undergrad and grad school. None of the CS undergrad curriculums I was involved with (either as a student or as a TA) had this level of architecture for undergrad CS majors.
For the record, my grad class used Hennessy and Patterson (http://www.amazon.com/Computer-Architecture-Quantitative-App...). Also, I think that "summary" should indicate that the real thing will have "much more grueling detail."
PH is the standard undergrad text for an arch course in much the same way as Wakerly is the standard for digital logic/components.
PH or HP? My intro course used Computer Organization and Design, and the senior course used Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (both are by the same authors).
Wow, didn't even realize the two authors had written two books on the subject. I meant the former and hadn't realized the parent of my post meant the latter, having not read the title after seeing the authors' names. Whoops!