i didn't get what you mean by networked data store. afaik almost all of kv stores are similar wrt "network".
i checked http://redis.io/topics/benchmarks and saw that kivaloo performs better within given constraints like value limit at 255 bytes. your benchmark page makes numbers worse because of that 128 mb option.
i didn't get what you mean by networked data store.
As opposed to a library like BDB.
your benchmark page makes numbers worse because of that 128 mb option.
I assumed that people would get "ok, here's the in-core performance, and here's the out-of-core performance" and understand that where that drop happens is a function of how much RAM they use. I suppose I should re-run the benchmarks with kivaloo set to use 1.5 GB of RAM.
Comments
i didn't get what you mean by networked data store. afaik almost all of kv stores are similar wrt "network".
i checked http://redis.io/topics/benchmarks and saw that kivaloo performs better within given constraints like value limit at 255 bytes. your benchmark page makes numbers worse because of that 128 mb option.
i didn't get what you mean by networked data store.
As opposed to a library like BDB.
your benchmark page makes numbers worse because of that 128 mb option.
I assumed that people would get "ok, here's the in-core performance, and here's the out-of-core performance" and understand that where that drop happens is a function of how much RAM they use. I suppose I should re-run the benchmarks with kivaloo set to use 1.5 GB of RAM.