The fatal flaw of this project, methinks and is especially relevant here on Startup (sorry, Hacker) News, is mixed interpretations about what a 'Startup' is.
On HN and in the broader tech community, a Startup is almost exclusively a tech-based, scalable, early stage business. It requires entrepreneurial skills.
In the broader business community, a startup is just an early stage business. That cafe around the corner from your server-filled garage? It's a startup. The guy who washes Zuckerburg's porsche? Startup.
So we see a site like 'Startup Britain' and, combined with the whole Silicon Roundabout push, think it's exclusively about our type of startup - tech entrepreneurs, and no doubt the government here wants more tech startups. But the government will gain maximum roi from this project by targeting the broader definitions of startups - ie, all, early business.
By going after all early businesses, unemployment is reduced (at least by the founders, and some of them will hire staff), tax bases will rise etc. I still feel this project has been a waste of time and money so far BUT claiming that 'startups' don't need advice on logos and renting offices and buying MSFT software until they've developed an MVP and a revenue stream misunderstands the fact that a vast majority of startups are the local hairdresser, estate agent, or handyman, not the next Google.
(See also the E-Myth for a basic explanation of how this confusion affects businesses down the track.)
Comments
The fatal flaw of this project, methinks and is especially relevant here on Startup (sorry, Hacker) News, is mixed interpretations about what a 'Startup' is.
On HN and in the broader tech community, a Startup is almost exclusively a tech-based, scalable, early stage business. It requires entrepreneurial skills.
In the broader business community, a startup is just an early stage business. That cafe around the corner from your server-filled garage? It's a startup. The guy who washes Zuckerburg's porsche? Startup.
So we see a site like 'Startup Britain' and, combined with the whole Silicon Roundabout push, think it's exclusively about our type of startup - tech entrepreneurs, and no doubt the government here wants more tech startups. But the government will gain maximum roi from this project by targeting the broader definitions of startups - ie, all, early business.
By going after all early businesses, unemployment is reduced (at least by the founders, and some of them will hire staff), tax bases will rise etc. I still feel this project has been a waste of time and money so far BUT claiming that 'startups' don't need advice on logos and renting offices and buying MSFT software until they've developed an MVP and a revenue stream misunderstands the fact that a vast majority of startups are the local hairdresser, estate agent, or handyman, not the next Google.
(See also the E-Myth for a basic explanation of how this confusion affects businesses down the track.)
Interesting... maybe we need to split off a site into more sections to first determine audience segments and then attack each?
I've started my own response to StartUpBritain.org with startupbritain-done-better.com
It's a project done last night after work :)