Phone GPS, in my experience, really doesn't. It is inaccurate, oftentimes 100ft off, and certainly drains battery faster than just about anything else.
What part of it works, on a phone, for applications such as these? Or were you just saying, in general, GPS technology does work?
I think GPS inaccuracy was the #1 reason Foursquare beat Gowalla. Gowalla used to enforce strict accuracy on check-ins and it rarely registered you in the place you were at.
In my experience, A-GPS works great. It’s hard to get a GPS signal in urban landscapes but there are tons of WiFi access points around which are very quick at determining your location and are reasonably accurate. I really don’t know what other sensors could bring to the table.
GPS doesn't "work" in the same way that he is referring to. For the purpose of identifying a point on the globe, with line-of-sight to the sky - GPS works fine.
But, what is really being talked about here is much deeper spatial awareness based on a range of sensor and relational data modeling.
They are using GPS, direction, lighting, sound and finally - actual images to determine all the spatial attributes of where you are, what your surroundings are and whom else is in your vicinity -- even if you don't know them.
This is stunning.
They will be able to know which parties are groups - where they are in relation to one another etc.
If they are already using all those data-points. I am absolutely positive they are will have audio voice recognition - keyword recognition in the future as well.
There are incredible uses for this, such as "here were some highlights of the parties conversations"
What we NEED is for someone to sniff the backhaul from the client and lets look at exactly what data is leaving our devices.
Comments
Am I the only one who thinks that contrary to the claims made by Color's CEO in the article, GPS does work?
Phone GPS, in my experience, really doesn't. It is inaccurate, oftentimes 100ft off, and certainly drains battery faster than just about anything else.
What part of it works, on a phone, for applications such as these? Or were you just saying, in general, GPS technology does work?
I think GPS inaccuracy was the #1 reason Foursquare beat Gowalla. Gowalla used to enforce strict accuracy on check-ins and it rarely registered you in the place you were at.
In my experience, A-GPS works great. It’s hard to get a GPS signal in urban landscapes but there are tons of WiFi access points around which are very quick at determining your location and are reasonably accurate. I really don’t know what other sensors could bring to the table.
Only with line of site of the sky, often a large part of it. (So works less well in cities, even outside.)
GPS doesn't "work" in the same way that he is referring to. For the purpose of identifying a point on the globe, with line-of-sight to the sky - GPS works fine.
But, what is really being talked about here is much deeper spatial awareness based on a range of sensor and relational data modeling.
They are using GPS, direction, lighting, sound and finally - actual images to determine all the spatial attributes of where you are, what your surroundings are and whom else is in your vicinity -- even if you don't know them.
This is stunning.
They will be able to know which parties are groups - where they are in relation to one another etc.
If they are already using all those data-points. I am absolutely positive they are will have audio voice recognition - keyword recognition in the future as well.
There are incredible uses for this, such as "here were some highlights of the parties conversations"
What we NEED is for someone to sniff the backhaul from the client and lets look at exactly what data is leaving our devices.
Saying that they can do is not stunning. Doing it is.
I totally agree -- but they seem to have a lot more on their side than simple words at this point; 40MM and their app out there...
I am sure they are a lot further along than vapor at this point.