You need to keep in mind that the tech media in Australia is just as rabid for clicks as the mainstream media, if not more rabid.
What the bill requires is that companies give targeted assistance where they can do so without compromising anybody else's security.
For example removing or weakening E2E encryption is absolutely not permitted by this bill, let alone required.
What might be permitted, for example, is adding a hard-coded list of account IDs to an app and if a user is in this list, the app sends plaintext to law enforcement. This would not impact anybody save the people who have been targeted.
Comments
The consequences of the bill were widely misreported. From the day it was passed it had strong exceptions. Have a look at section 317ZG: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ta1997214...
You need to keep in mind that the tech media in Australia is just as rabid for clicks as the mainstream media, if not more rabid.
What the bill requires is that companies give targeted assistance where they can do so without compromising anybody else's security.
For example removing or weakening E2E encryption is absolutely not permitted by this bill, let alone required.
What might be permitted, for example, is adding a hard-coded list of account IDs to an app and if a user is in this list, the app sends plaintext to law enforcement. This would not impact anybody save the people who have been targeted.