On the other, if you find a way to get people to pay you $30 a month for an otherwise free or cheap service, then bravo. Even if I think it’s silly, it’s a progressive tax on something way less evil than, say, bottling public water and then selling it back to the public.
As much as I’m not a fan of paying that much for email, the fact that anyone has the ability to interrupt you has an enormous potential cost.
Being more effective with email and communicating is a life changing discipline and skill.
The 30/mo should be seen as the hundreds or thousands it can make or safe some people who have to be effective with their time and communication. Again, maybe not for everyone.
Comments
On the one hand, that’s ridiculous.
On the other, if you find a way to get people to pay you $30 a month for an otherwise free or cheap service, then bravo. Even if I think it’s silly, it’s a progressive tax on something way less evil than, say, bottling public water and then selling it back to the public.
As much as I’m not a fan of paying that much for email, the fact that anyone has the ability to interrupt you has an enormous potential cost.
Being more effective with email and communicating is a life changing discipline and skill.
The 30/mo should be seen as the hundreds or thousands it can make or safe some people who have to be effective with their time and communication. Again, maybe not for everyone.