I don't see what's so snide about 'some greens', the Greens are a political party in Australia, they have a strong anti-nuclear stance as I recall(might be wrong).
We have a Green Party in the UK too, but "some greens" would generally be said in a negative way, and referring to people with environmental concerns rather that just Green Party supported.
Even about a political party - if someone who until just now was a tory MP said "some tories think..." and then went on to dismiss their views I'd make the same point.
Maybe I took it the wrong way, but that's how it read to me. Either way seems like a fairly nonsense article.
Comments
I don't see what's so snide about 'some greens', the Greens are a political party in Australia, they have a strong anti-nuclear stance as I recall(might be wrong).
We have a Green Party in the UK too, but "some greens" would generally be said in a negative way, and referring to people with environmental concerns rather that just Green Party supported.
Even about a political party - if someone who until just now was a tory MP said "some tories think..." and then went on to dismiss their views I'd make the same point.
Maybe I took it the wrong way, but that's how it read to me. Either way seems like a fairly nonsense article.
You can't argue that because 'some greens' is offensive in the UK, an article written in Australia saying 'some greens' is offensive.
You are free to feel offended, but that doesn't mean the author is at fault.
To nitpick, the article was written for a British audience, by George Monbiot who is a columnist for the Guardian.
The SMH (and the whole Fairfax group) don't really write articles any more.
Yes, until I realised it was a British piece I was really confused by his expression "high latitudes like ours" (par. 9).
Guardian original here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nucl...