Comment on Dynamic languages are static languagesparentComments−Ingaz15yTotally agree.I think it's because "ultra strict" and "dynamic" both oriented on programmer. "Non-strict" oriented on compiler."Ultra strictness" and dynamic typing in different ways, but both gives help to programmer. Non-strict is just a pain without benefit.
Comments
Totally agree.
I think it's because "ultra strict" and "dynamic" both oriented on programmer. "Non-strict" oriented on compiler.
"Ultra strictness" and dynamic typing in different ways, but both gives help to programmer. Non-strict is just a pain without benefit.