Skip to content

Comment on Wave Disk Engine Could Be 3.5 Times More Efficient Than Combustion Enginesparent

Comments

the article claims standard car engine efficiency is 0.15, so 3.5*0.15 = 0.45

They really cheat with that number. They are using engine-to-wheels efficiency, but then talk about the wave-disk in a hybrid presumably with no drive-train losses. A gasoline engine running over a much smaller RPM range will run much more efficient than 15%.

An efficient car may run at about 18% on average (hence the 15% after external losses), but quite possibly have a peak efficiency of 30%

Also, they compare to a gasoline Otto cycle engine. The diesel cycle is more efficient than the Otto cycle. A cars turbocharged diesel may run nearly 30% average efficiency, and peak efficiency in the 40s. (The ratio of peak/average eefficiency in diesel engines tends to be closer to unity than in gasoline engines).

There are actual operating now diesel engines operating at over 50% efficiency, but they are not the sort of thing you would put in your car (more the sort of thing where your car would fit inside the engine).

[edit]I wanted to find info on the prius before posting this, but was unable to. I finally did, and the complexity of the drivetrain is to (among other things) maximize the amount of the time that the engine is in it's peak efficiency area of 230g/kWh which is roughly an efficiency of 33%. Since the article specifically talks about running the engine in a hybrid comparison, this is apples-to-apples, and it is less than a 2x improvement, not 3.5x

[edit2]The Prius is not a vanilla Otto cycle, but it's pretty close. I really think of it as more of a Miller cycle than an Atkinson, but in any event it's a 4-stroke spark-ignited reciprocating piston engine.

Note also that the Prius engine employs the Atkinson cycle rather than the Otto.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.