Comment on Understanding Quake’s Fast Inverse Square RootComments−harshpotatoes15yAnd of course, they skip over the only part I don't understand about that hack. The real meat and potatoes, the magic number.−dkersten15yHeh, yeah. I believe Chris Lomonts paper talks about how it was derived (at least, he derives a new one, so I guess he must have figured it out - it went over my head though)
Comments
And of course, they skip over the only part I don't understand about that hack. The real meat and potatoes, the magic number.
Heh, yeah. I believe Chris Lomonts paper talks about how it was derived (at least, he derives a new one, so I guess he must have figured it out - it went over my head though)