Skip to content

Comment on Privacy Not Included

Comments

Right.

Automatic updates would seem to be a negative for privacy. They imply a backdoor to force changes on a device. Automatic update features have often been used to reduce consumer rights.

It's not even clear they're a win for security. If you shipped some simple device with so much attack surface it needs security fixes, you're doing it wrong.

Wait what? You think security fixes are a sign that software was built 'wrong'? Every piece of software has security bugs - it's the ones that never have any security fixes that I would be scared of.

You think security fixes are a sign that software was built 'wrong'?

Of course. If it needs a fix, it was built wrong. We've become too accepting of low-security software. There's no excuse for this in embedded devices that don't do much.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.