The release notes of Crystal 0.34 say "Having as much as possible portable code is part of the goal of the std-lib. One of the areas that were in need of polishing was how Errno and WinError were handled. The Errno and WinError exceptions are now gone, and were replaced by a new hierarchy of exceptions."
So I have modified
rescue ex: Errno
raise ErrorException.new(ex.message, NONE) if ex.errno == Errno::EPIPE
to
rescue ex: IO::Error
raise ErrorException.new(ex.message, NONE) if ex.os_error == Errno::EPIPE
Comments
Crystal is comparable to Java in performance. I am impressed with it. See https://github.com/nukata/little-scheme#performance and https://github.com/nukata/little-scheme#performance-on-the-t...
I have just updated my Scheme interpreter in Crystal (https://github.com/nukata/little-scheme-in-crystal), which I used on the above benchmark test, along to Crystal 0.34.
The release notes of Crystal 0.34 say "Having as much as possible portable code is part of the goal of the std-lib. One of the areas that were in need of polishing was how Errno and WinError were handled. The Errno and WinError exceptions are now gone, and were replaced by a new hierarchy of exceptions." So I have modified
to though it is still dependent on POSIX. >_<