More than anything Urbit is impossible to comprehend. All I understood from it is that it's some bizarre distributed something with an alt right attachment.
While I am familiar with Urbit's origins, I think the article in question could very easily fit into an anarchist framework.
Just because the original creator was a neoreactionary does not entail that the software is intended to (or even can) promote the establishment of a neoreactionary political system.
Comments
More than anything Urbit is impossible to comprehend. All I understood from it is that it's some bizarre distributed something with an alt right attachment.
While I am familiar with Urbit's origins, I think the article in question could very easily fit into an anarchist framework.
Just because the original creator was a neoreactionary does not entail that the software is intended to (or even can) promote the establishment of a neoreactionary political system.
Where did you get anything remotely "alt-right" from that article?
Probably referring to Curtis Yarvin (founder, “no longer involved”) wrote a bunch of alt-right stuff