There is always a fair amount of noise which I just tend to ignore. YSlow always penalises me for not using a CDN for example.
Something useful to add would be links for the compressed images you use to work out how compressing the images could save space. A side by side comparison would be pretty useful so I could see how the compressing changes the look of the page.
Just for fun I ran it over http://duckduckgo.com which comes back with 100. Google comes back with 98. Interesting.
Comments
Wow, 98 is a great score (higher than Google!)
You're right, there's a lot of noise in the results. If the size reduction is small, like a few bytes, there's no need to show that.
There is always a fair amount of noise which I just tend to ignore. YSlow always penalises me for not using a CDN for example.
Something useful to add would be links for the compressed images you use to work out how compressing the images could save space. A side by side comparison would be pretty useful so I could see how the compressing changes the look of the page.
Just for fun I ran it over http://duckduckgo.com which comes back with 100. Google comes back with 98. Interesting.