The article is more why than how, so I have a question for HN. Is it acceptable for a company to not do code review until late in the funding game (like series E/F)? Like move fast and break things to get MVP going and break a lot of best practices doing it, and at what point should that be reigned in?
Imagine you are at a unicorn with physical product already operating in public, and a C laughs at a suggestion of code review and says its too long, hard and expensive. What would you do?
Comments
The article is more why than how, so I have a question for HN. Is it acceptable for a company to not do code review until late in the funding game (like series E/F)? Like move fast and break things to get MVP going and break a lot of best practices doing it, and at what point should that be reigned in?
Imagine you are at a unicorn with physical product already operating in public, and a C laughs at a suggestion of code review and says its too long, hard and expensive. What would you do?