That's great, but paper's pollution footprint is far larger than mere carbon output. There's so much focus on climate change that people forget a bucket of mercury is carbon-neutral but still not great to pour in a lake.
Someone elsewhere in the discussion asks for a Kindle edition; that'd be a great way to keep unnecessary paper down.
Comments
That's great, but paper's pollution footprint is far larger than mere carbon output. There's so much focus on climate change that people forget a bucket of mercury is carbon-neutral but still not great to pour in a lake.
Someone elsewhere in the discussion asks for a Kindle edition; that'd be a great way to keep unnecessary paper down.
Strip mine the land for more minerals for more never-decomposing plastic devices with chemical batteries?
I'd rather have the dead trees, thanks.
I read my Kindle content on the smartphone I already own.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Of course you will prefer dead trees. There's money to be made isn't it? :-) Thanks, but no thanks!