Skip to content

Comment on Australia's severe wildfires were predicted by the government over a decade agoparent

Comments

Sorry let me rephrase, a carbon tax would have done these things:

- reduced Australia's carbon emissions (not a massive deal by itself)

- built up a public repository of cash that could have been allocated to something useful, like funding the fire services

- lead by example; we will now never know if Australia's leading by example would have encouraged a wider implementation of carbon tax schemes and a reduction in carbon emissions

You are correct that it would have not by itself mitigated the natural drought cycle in Australia, however the opportunity to reduce the impact was lost - and Australia is poorer for it.

Finally, I did not suggest that a carbon tax would have stopped these fires, only that I would like to do an analysis between what the potential sum of taxes would have been versus the donation totals.

Cheers.

Also relatively unquantifiable but:

-divert funding to sustainable and productive industries which would further reduce Australian carbon emissions

-create commercial opportunities in exportable industries that would have positive impact on GDP and net exports.

Also, notably, it does nothing to impact arson rates - which are the primary cause of the crisis.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.