Netbooks use way cheaper hard disks, instead of ssd.
Netbooks don't have touchscreens.
Netbooks don't have GPS, accelerometers, and gyros.
Netbook don't have a battery that last 9 hours.
If there is a netbook with this specs,witch they are, it is going to be as expensive as tablets.
So, there is no "equivalent netbook" with half the price. Putting a pixel qi screen to my netbook cost me $275, a touchscreen $100 plus shipping cost, plus my time, plus the risk I break my netbook(I nearly broke it when bending one of the screen connection pins).
GPS - when I can get a standalone satnav unit for $70 with its own processor, screen battery et al, that's hardly adding up to a huge extra cost. The accelerometer and gyro can be handled by a single relatively cheap chip from what I remember.
Netbooks also have keyboards, touchpads and extra interface parts such as USB and SVGA that tablets don't tend to have - not expensive components in themselves but extra parts to integrate into the design that aren't supplied with tablets. And, in a large number of cases, they come with a Windows license.
So, we're left with an SSD rather than HDD (retail, marginal cost about $70 for bigger drives than tablets use) and a touchscreen rather than a non-touchscreen (don't know the component suppliers for them to research it).
I still don't see why they're so much more expensive, beyond 'because we can' novelty value. The numbers simply don't stack up for me.
Comments
Netbooks use way cheaper hard disks, instead of ssd. Netbooks don't have touchscreens. Netbooks don't have GPS, accelerometers, and gyros. Netbook don't have a battery that last 9 hours.
If there is a netbook with this specs,witch they are, it is going to be as expensive as tablets.
So, there is no "equivalent netbook" with half the price. Putting a pixel qi screen to my netbook cost me $275, a touchscreen $100 plus shipping cost, plus my time, plus the risk I break my netbook(I nearly broke it when bending one of the screen connection pins).
You certainly can get netbooks with 9h battery life. http://www.compuplus.com/ASUS-Eee-PC-1015PED-MU17-1166505.ht... for example.
GPS - when I can get a standalone satnav unit for $70 with its own processor, screen battery et al, that's hardly adding up to a huge extra cost. The accelerometer and gyro can be handled by a single relatively cheap chip from what I remember.
Netbooks also have keyboards, touchpads and extra interface parts such as USB and SVGA that tablets don't tend to have - not expensive components in themselves but extra parts to integrate into the design that aren't supplied with tablets. And, in a large number of cases, they come with a Windows license.
So, we're left with an SSD rather than HDD (retail, marginal cost about $70 for bigger drives than tablets use) and a touchscreen rather than a non-touchscreen (don't know the component suppliers for them to research it).
I still don't see why they're so much more expensive, beyond 'because we can' novelty value. The numbers simply don't stack up for me.