Are you suggesting we should give each position on any topic as much praise and support as any other, regardless of its merit?
Or are you suggesting we should implement a sort of stack-exchange canonical topic/response regime where a group of 'community managers' rigorously partition the subjects into an imposed clustered domain by fast closing and marking as 'duplicates'?
Sure, this site has it's typical positions, and topics do tend to be revisited often, but isn't that the nature of a more conversational social space?
Comments
Are you suggesting we should give each position on any topic as much praise and support as any other, regardless of its merit?
Or are you suggesting we should implement a sort of stack-exchange canonical topic/response regime where a group of 'community managers' rigorously partition the subjects into an imposed clustered domain by fast closing and marking as 'duplicates'?
Sure, this site has it's typical positions, and topics do tend to be revisited often, but isn't that the nature of a more conversational social space?