Skip to content

Comment on Greplin (YC W10) open sources 10-15x faster protocol buffers for Pythonparent

Comments

As an aside, I don't really like the idea that "open source" should also have to be synonymous with "free software". Can the intended users access (and possibly modify at least locally) the source? Then it's open source. Why do we need "open source" to be identical to "free software"? Isn't that what "free software" means?

Any downvoters want to explain here? I don't understand what's wrong with the question. Please explain more fully why "open source" should be synonymous with "free software", or, if you downvoted for another reason, please tell me where I went wrong. Thanks.

I didn't downvote (I haven't even been to the page since before you posted that comment until just now), but maybe I can help you understand why I disagree with what you said:

http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/when-open-source...

tl;dr: The term "open source" was coined by the people who founded the OSI, and they provided a definition for it. The term many people in the open source community use for software whose source is available (but not open source) is "source-available software".

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.