I asked my mother for her thoughts on it - she currently teaches a few autistic children, in the past she's offered private tuition to children and adults learning English as a foriegn language, and she's also had ~10-15 for-children novels published in the UK.
[19:58:13] Hannah: I think a 12-year-old might find it a bit patronising. It's not bad, but I think there are better things of that sort.
[20:08:18] Hannah: I think any slightly intellectual child over five would find it interesting if it was their first exposure to that sort of thing. But I'd prefer to expose them to Lewis Carroll or Phantom Tolbooth.
(She also points out that it needs proofreading.)
But of course, her negativity doesn't mean you won't be successful :)
That's good feedback -- thanks! I'm surprised that she found it too easy for a 12 year old, but Just Right for a precocious 5 year old. I was afraid of erring in the other direction.
Did she give examples of good books about computer science for 12 year olds? Maybe she meant kid's books in general?
Proofreading: it's a manuscript, of course it needs proofing. :D
I can't speak to when I was a five year old, but I think certainly I would have been ready to grasp those concepts when I was a few years younger than twelve.
No examples from her (other than "I'd prefer to expose them to Lewis Carroll or Phantom Tolbooth").
Proofreading - wasn't meant as a general piece of fairly obvious and patronising advice, like "if you write a book, remember to proofread!" She meant that the article you published wasn't proofread.
Comments
What age range are you targetting, or do you not have one in mind?
In my head Laurie is eleven, so I'm targeting ten and up. That feels about right, thinking back on my childhood.
I asked my mother for her thoughts on it - she currently teaches a few autistic children, in the past she's offered private tuition to children and adults learning English as a foriegn language, and she's also had ~10-15 for-children novels published in the UK.
[19:58:13] Hannah: I think a 12-year-old might find it a bit patronising. It's not bad, but I think there are better things of that sort.
[20:08:18] Hannah: I think any slightly intellectual child over five would find it interesting if it was their first exposure to that sort of thing. But I'd prefer to expose them to Lewis Carroll or Phantom Tolbooth.
(She also points out that it needs proofreading.)
But of course, her negativity doesn't mean you won't be successful :)
That's good feedback -- thanks! I'm surprised that she found it too easy for a 12 year old, but Just Right for a precocious 5 year old. I was afraid of erring in the other direction.
Did she give examples of good books about computer science for 12 year olds? Maybe she meant kid's books in general?
Proofreading: it's a manuscript, of course it needs proofing. :D
I can't speak to when I was a five year old, but I think certainly I would have been ready to grasp those concepts when I was a few years younger than twelve.
No examples from her (other than "I'd prefer to expose them to Lewis Carroll or Phantom Tolbooth").
Proofreading - wasn't meant as a general piece of fairly obvious and patronising advice, like "if you write a book, remember to proofread!" She meant that the article you published wasn't proofread.
Corin