Skip to content

Comment on Google Grabs Patent for Web-Based Translationparent

Comments

That doesn't excuse it. You can make the same argument about Microsoft, who apparently thought it would be more profitable to engage in illegal monopolistic practices and then fight the ensuing legal battles than to operate legally.

Now I concede that I may not understand defensive patents very well, but if any company is able to document an "invention" in order to demonstrate prior art and drive away patent trolls it would be Google. And they could set a nice precedent by taking exactly that tack.

Just because you are able to do something doesn't mean that you should do it. And when you do bad things just because you are able, you are evil.

I'm hoping someone sheds some light on more than meets the eye here.

Oh, I fully agree that it's evil, it's just that the whole bloody industry pretty much engages in this.

And that isn't an excuse by any stretch of the imagination, it's just that if they didn't they'd be buried in patent lawsuits and they'd have nothing to strike back with except for endless litigation. Typically the big guys cross license and everybody pretends it's fine. Business as usual, sad as it is.

The losers are the smaller innovators.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.