Comment on Fire shuts down cell towers in CAparentComments−thaumasiotes6yThat's the point. There isn't a good reason for them to be down. Fire hasn't shut them down. No circumstance other than whimsy has shut them down.The HN title isn't even taken from the page, and yet -- somehow -- it's still up in all its totally inaccurate glory.−colinmegillOP6ySuggest a better title and will edit!−thaumasiotes6y"874 cell towers down in CA"While I'm grousing, the HN link is to a tweet that just links https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/10/28/why-you-cant-make-cel... ; unless we're really interested in the reply tweets, the Mercury News link might be a better target.−colinmegillOP6yAgreed, this is better, though I might add ", wildfires implicated". TIL one cannot edit posts and change links, unless I am missing something. Thought I could but maybe that is before it gets votes.
Comments
That's the point. There isn't a good reason for them to be down. Fire hasn't shut them down. No circumstance other than whimsy has shut them down.
The HN title isn't even taken from the page, and yet -- somehow -- it's still up in all its totally inaccurate glory.
Suggest a better title and will edit!
"874 cell towers down in CA"
While I'm grousing, the HN link is to a tweet that just links https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/10/28/why-you-cant-make-cel... ; unless we're really interested in the reply tweets, the Mercury News link might be a better target.
Agreed, this is better, though I might add ", wildfires implicated". TIL one cannot edit posts and change links, unless I am missing something. Thought I could but maybe that is before it gets votes.