Good question. So far, we are only hosting tiny files (almost everything is well under 10kb).
Given the how cheap CloudFront works out to be for files of that size, we can support quite a lot of growth, even if we have to incur the expense personally.
We do plan to monetize it at some stage. Some ideas are premium accounts that mash all of your resources together and host them for you.
The key benefit of hosting common scripts on a single CDN is that everyone who uses a script can point to the same URL, hence dramatically increasing the chance that a page visitor will already have the file in their browser cache and won't have to fetch it at all.
For that to work, you need to be used on a bunch of large sites and hence be serving a lot of traffic - which at CloudFront's rates will quickly become expensive.
Comments
Good question. So far, we are only hosting tiny files (almost everything is well under 10kb).
Given the how cheap CloudFront works out to be for files of that size, we can support quite a lot of growth, even if we have to incur the expense personally.
We do plan to monetize it at some stage. Some ideas are premium accounts that mash all of your resources together and host them for you.
The key benefit of hosting common scripts on a single CDN is that everyone who uses a script can point to the same URL, hence dramatically increasing the chance that a page visitor will already have the file in their browser cache and won't have to fetch it at all.
For that to work, you need to be used on a bunch of large sites and hence be serving a lot of traffic - which at CloudFront's rates will quickly become expensive.
Mashing the resources together would surely destroy the speed boost of a CDN?