Comment on Beating Decades of Optimized C with 80 Lines of HaskellComments−imode6yI don't consider this "beating" the C version. The new version isn't even semantically equivalent. You had to resort to multiple cores. A parallelized C version of wc would probably be even faster.There's not much content here, IMO.
Comments
I don't consider this "beating" the C version. The new version isn't even semantically equivalent. You had to resort to multiple cores. A parallelized C version of wc would probably be even faster.
There's not much content here, IMO.