Its snarky because there are large contributors to the tech sector whose profits simply funnel up to charitable organizations because they are owned by them.

The latest iteration of impact is born from ignorance of whats already out there and this is mutually exclusive of getting B Corp statutes passed and choosing to use them.

It is just Shariah compliant organizations rebranded for an islamaphobic audience (or maybe specifically “Shariah”-phobic). Kind of cute, I can understand how people are unaware of contexts outside of “theocratic human rights abuses”.

Constructive suggestions on B Corp? Its fine what they are trying to do, standardizing what impact even is and streamlining it with a single incorporation. I dont have any quantitative analysis of B Corp efficacy, does anyone? Foundations on the other hand are forced to make charitable grants annually, and this is quantifiable. they simply own shares of C-Corps, therefore many C-Corp workers are doing impact work whether they made that conscious decision or not.