Skip to content

Comment on South African bank advises against the use of password managersparent

Comments

My question was specifically about pass, so your point about crappy password managers that don't clean up the clipboard is not relevant.

We can also ignore the attacks that apply to manually entering a password, as my question was about ways in which password managers are less secure compared to manually entered passwords.

What's left?

Brute force: not quite possible with the default GPG key type.

Dictionary: you'd need to guess my complex passphrase to decrypt my secret key (assuming you have access to it), and I can assure you my password if I use pass would be as long and as complex as I can make it, so I'm not sure which dictionary would contain it.

Autofill hijack: I don't use autofill for passwords.

Brute force: not quite possible
Dictionary: you'd need to guess my complex passphrase

Totally doable. You don't brute force the key, you brute force the passphrase that protects the key. Ask five eyes if password-protected GPG keys are impenetrable. A very large computer, smart algorithm, and good sigint can make short work of a "complex" passphrase. The difference between the password manager and memorized passwords is, if you crack the password manager, you have all the keys. If you memorize passwords, they have to intercept each key to compromise it. The most basic attack vector goes from "exfiltrate data one time" to "intercept all logins for a month".

Cold boot and evil maid also work better against someone who unlocks their gpg key for longer than a second, and extra code = extra possibility for bugs.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.