Sure -- some parts are, but some parts aren't. It's intrinsic to the nature of working in a team or coaching a team. If you notice weak spots consistently, is it a fluke? Probably not. If you notice complaints about the ability of the team, division and org to collaborately smoothly, is that a fluke? Again, probably not. By the time you fine-tune all the weak spots properly, you have a very high functioning team. But it takes a lot of iteration.
Comments
You talk to them and the people they work with or whose work depends on them. How quickly, autonomously and completely do problems get solved?
Metrics are a distraction unless in the service of answering that question.
That’s the default, I guess, my main concern is that it’s very subjective.
Sure -- some parts are, but some parts aren't. It's intrinsic to the nature of working in a team or coaching a team. If you notice weak spots consistently, is it a fluke? Probably not. If you notice complaints about the ability of the team, division and org to collaborately smoothly, is that a fluke? Again, probably not. By the time you fine-tune all the weak spots properly, you have a very high functioning team. But it takes a lot of iteration.