I don’t think these people would classify themselves as “anti vaccine”, they would classify as “safe vaccine advocates”. That’s the open question which has real science begging this question.
But that is not the point of that article which is about whether google should be engaging in scientific disputes, political disputes, etc.
Comments
I don’t think these people would classify themselves as “anti vaccine”, they would classify as “safe vaccine advocates”. That’s the open question which has real science begging this question. But that is not the point of that article which is about whether google should be engaging in scientific disputes, political disputes, etc.
Vaccines are already safe, to the best of our testing.
Google is a private service, and in theory could censor anything they wanted.
Anti-vaccine isn't just a joke, but a serious threat to the survivability of the human race.