Not quite sure what I'm projecting here... Your statement "I would probably classify myself as a 10x" is very misguided, and your response here is a poor attempt at manipulation. I only spoke up because I saw others agreeing with you about being a 10x under your definition; which is more aligned with a programming intern's view of the world.
I highlighted the fact that ignoring OOP is a weakness for @foobar_ and their response was essentially "you force every problem into objects and you suck". Interacting with this person is like carrying an open bag of snakes.
Comments
* avoiding object-oriented programming
* avoiding testing
* avoiding security
* avoiding documentation
* fixating on known platforms
* a highly inflated ego
* demeaning other programmers
* arguing with experienced programmers during code review
* using the word 'maths' (the plural form of math is mathematics)
None of this classifies you as a 10x programmer and your comment has 'arrogant' written all over it. You have expert syndrome.
Maths is the proper term in British English.
[flagged]
Classic projection. You probably suffer from it. I spell out my weaknesses clearly.
And Object Astronauts suck.
Not quite sure what I'm projecting here... Your statement "I would probably classify myself as a 10x" is very misguided, and your response here is a poor attempt at manipulation. I only spoke up because I saw others agreeing with you about being a 10x under your definition; which is more aligned with a programming intern's view of the world.
Here's my opinion on what I have seen in the workforce for 10x and 100x engineers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20441541
I think you'll connect with my last statement in that comment.
the correct term is architecture astronauts, but we get your point.
Yeah, didn't tackle that one...
I highlighted the fact that ignoring OOP is a weakness for @foobar_ and their response was essentially "you force every problem into objects and you suck". Interacting with this person is like carrying an open bag of snakes.