i read through some answers here and i nodded in agreement with raganwald saying that this only worked as a filter on failure.
but then i read this and i thought "would i really want to give a job to someone who needs a pen and paper to subtract 1 from 255?"
i'm not sure what the lesson is here - perhaps that programming tests are dangerous because it is very easy to over-interpret the results, even when you start with the best of intentions?
Comments
i read through some answers here and i nodded in agreement with raganwald saying that this only worked as a filter on failure.
but then i read this and i thought "would i really want to give a job to someone who needs a pen and paper to subtract 1 from 255?"
i'm not sure what the lesson is here - perhaps that programming tests are dangerous because it is very easy to over-interpret the results, even when you start with the best of intentions?
[edited for grammar]
No, I would be very liberal in accounting for interview-nervousness.
Now, if it appeared that the candidate had no idea how to solve the problem, that would be a different story.