I don't understand. Why would celebrate be bound by these ToS?
We talk about how we want to abolish the CFAA so we can't (morally) turn around and use it when it suits us.
EULA is not the law. Terms of service is not the law. It is absurd to say that Apple should have the legal authority to (in a practical sense) legislate. Yes, theoretically speaking we don't need an iPhone to stay alive but still. You could have argued we didn't need Carnegie steel to stay alive either.
Comments
I don't understand. Why would celebrate be bound by these ToS?
We talk about how we want to abolish the CFAA so we can't (morally) turn around and use it when it suits us.
EULA is not the law. Terms of service is not the law. It is absurd to say that Apple should have the legal authority to (in a practical sense) legislate. Yes, theoretically speaking we don't need an iPhone to stay alive but still. You could have argued we didn't need Carnegie steel to stay alive either.