Skip to content

Comment on Report finds wealth of top 1% up $21T, bottom 50% down $900B since 1989parent

Comments

So... what is the lesson you want us to take away? It's true that individuals have varying amounts of success and move in and out of any given bracket all the time, but why is that important to what is clearly a demographic point?

On average, if you were poor in the 80's you're poorer now. Some of your poor cohort aren't as poor, and some have lifted themselves out of poverty entirely. Yet more of them are doing worse than they were.

That's bad, right? It's a problem you'd like to see fixed, yes? And it certainly is what the statistic means.

Not only that. It'd be better to be poor in the 1980s, because since then it has become more difficult to move out of poverty.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.