Comment on Ask HN: Why are ISO standards so expensive?parentComments−number67yThere should be a scihub for isos−danmg7yhard to search for since they're numbered, and people collect the ones that are relevant to them personally−arm7yUnfortunately, that torrent doesn’t seem to include all the standards. For example, none of these seem to be included:http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC35/WG1/−NikkiA7yIf you still have it, can you check for ISO-1000 being there?−throwawaymememe7yThis seems to be a copy (no idea how exact the copy is): https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.10005.1994/page/n5−NikkiA7yThat's ISO-10005, ISO-1000 is the specification of STEbus which was a CPU semi-agnostic version of STDbus (which was Z80 specific).−throwawaymee7yI first searched for it on Wikipedia here[1] and then searched for the title.STEbus seems to be IEEE 1000 and ISO 10859, perhaps you got confused with the numbers?[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_1000−throwawaymememe7yWouldn't numbers make them easier to search? Sci-hub searches using DOI too after all.
Comments
There should be a scihub for isos
hard to search for since they're numbered, and people collect the ones that are relevant to them personally
Unfortunately, that torrent doesn’t seem to include all the standards. For example, none of these seem to be included:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC35/WG1/
If you still have it, can you check for ISO-1000 being there?
This seems to be a copy (no idea how exact the copy is): https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.10005.1994/page/n5
That's ISO-10005, ISO-1000 is the specification of STEbus which was a CPU semi-agnostic version of STDbus (which was Z80 specific).
I first searched for it on Wikipedia here[1] and then searched for the title.
STEbus seems to be IEEE 1000 and ISO 10859, perhaps you got confused with the numbers?
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_1000
Wouldn't numbers make them easier to search? Sci-hub searches using DOI too after all.