Skip to content

Comment on Analysis of whether IMDB ratings suffer recency biasparent

Comments

The problem with your formulation is that 'better' is perhaps the most subjective word there is. Define it in measurable terms, and perhaps you have a reading there. There are many factors to consider which may lead you to find things less clear-cut, for example here's one or two, with some sub-factors - Modern audience Preference for familiar patterns in: (eg) -- acting styles -- music used -- visual tricks and norms -- special effects styles -- acting styles -- soundtrack loudness -- colour and high resolution -- High Concept movies -- Fantasy and Comic-related films -- modern movie themes and topics - Internationalisation of movies, so that fans from abroad prefer modern films which are more universalised and less American-specific (see literature)

Right, I'm not asserting that my alternative title is the correct one, I'm lampooning the assertion that IMDB is "suffering from recency bias" as opposed to a more neutral claim like "ratings for more recent movies are higher."

Answering the question of _why_ they went up is a lot harder to prove.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.