Comment on Nim 0.20.0 (1.0 RC1) releasedparentComments−dmos627y(-> clojure clojure)−dickeytk7yNot (-> lisp clojure)?−NikkiA7ythreading lisp through clojure is probably just going to get messy tbh.−agumonkey7ywe need an ourobouros glyph−contras19707yλf. (λx. f (x x)) (λx. f (x x))−agumonkey7ythat's a long glyph, but I'll take
Comments
(-> clojure clojure)
Not (-> lisp clojure)?
threading lisp through clojure is probably just going to get messy tbh.
we need an ourobouros glyph
λf. (λx. f (x x)) (λx. f (x x))
that's a long glyph, but I'll take