I posted for the long Kate Adie video in the article which I had not seen before.
The other reason is my concern at a defence minister even mentioning this event when everyone is aware of the state position already. It seems to be an expansion of the conversation from trade and market access to ideology which is unfortunate. There's enough to sort out with just market access, currency flows and IP.
Comments
I posted for the long Kate Adie video in the article which I had not seen before.
The other reason is my concern at a defence minister even mentioning this event when everyone is aware of the state position already. It seems to be an expansion of the conversation from trade and market access to ideology which is unfortunate. There's enough to sort out with just market access, currency flows and IP.
As detailed in the article, he didn't "mention" the event but was replying to a specific question about it during an event in Singapore.