Comment on Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook reviewparentComments−k__7yDo the oldest people predominantly die of cancer?−weberc27yThe parent’s comment is tautologically true: if nothing kills you first, cancer will eventually kill you.−gnulinux7yThat is, given that humans eventually die.−stcredzero7yI think infections are the primary cause of death for the oldest people. If lifespans were several times longer, most of us would be dying from an immune deficiency caused by cytomegalovirus. We just don't live long enough.−ska7yNo, but they mostly die with cancer(s), iirc.−jacquesm7yhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043499/Has pneumonia and 'frailty' as the predominant causes.−tonyedgecombe7yI’m sure I read that once you reach a certain age the risk starts to fall off.
Comments
Do the oldest people predominantly die of cancer?
The parent’s comment is tautologically true: if nothing kills you first, cancer will eventually kill you.
That is, given that humans eventually die.
I think infections are the primary cause of death for the oldest people. If lifespans were several times longer, most of us would be dying from an immune deficiency caused by cytomegalovirus. We just don't live long enough.
No, but they mostly die with cancer(s), iirc.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043499/
Has pneumonia and 'frailty' as the predominant causes.
I’m sure I read that once you reach a certain age the risk starts to fall off.