Skip to content

Comment on In Defense of Fahrenheit

Comments

The author lists the importance of a global temperature scale, then shows a map of North America overlaid with some dots.

For many people that's Celsius, but for many others it's Fahrenheit.

That second 'many' is disingenuous. For about 90% of the planet's population it's Celsius, and for about 10% it's Fahrenheit.

Author also has some pretty arbitrary and bewildering requirements, including wanting a scale of 0 to 100, yet also avoiding any 3-digit numbers.

Any claims about 'intuition' are misguided -- Celsius makes more sense because a) most people use it, and b) it maps onto the rest of the SI units.

That I happen to feel comfortable at a somewhat arbitrary 21 (c) is not a sufficient or satisfactory reason for other people to let go of deprecated temperature scales.

The requirements list reads as a description of farenheit, which the author then uses in a roundabout way to conclude his presupposition that farenheit is the better unit.

For about 90% of the planet's population it's Celsius, and for about 10% it's Fahrenheit.

I thought only the US and a few very small countries use Fahrenheit, which is not more than 5% of the world population?

A quick glance at the numbers on Wikipedia puts it a bit under 5%, the bulk of which is inhabitants of the US, but I did leave out the Bahamas for convenience.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.