Rather than "hashing" passwords -- basically replacing the text with a string of seemingly random letters that can only be deciphered with a code -- Google says ...
No. The hashed password can never be "deciphered". That's part of the point of using a cryptographic hash.
Am I alone that I find basic errors like this really annoying?
Comments
The second paragraph:
No. The hashed password can never be "deciphered". That's part of the point of using a cryptographic hash.
Am I alone that I find basic errors like this really annoying?
No, you're not alone. That sentence in that piece is embarassing.