In the book he discusses both how engineers use science and how scientists use engineering. It's not that he doesn't know what he's talking about, just that this is a very short article.
I guess I should read his book... but his defitions of engineering and science are not good enough fmpov because there is no matter to verify. A simple example is that you could interchange the definitions and they would not be 100% incorrect either.
Comments
In the book he discusses both how engineers use science and how scientists use engineering. It's not that he doesn't know what he's talking about, just that this is a very short article.
I guess I should read his book... but his defitions of engineering and science are not good enough fmpov because there is no matter to verify. A simple example is that you could interchange the definitions and they would not be 100% incorrect either.