Skip to content

Comment on Engineering Is Not Science

Comments

I ve always considered Engineering an application of science to solve problems (to make humanity better, if you want the pure, idealistic definition). In my opinion,

Engineering = f(Science).

Someone wanna take a shot at the function?

By the type of engineering you're talking about (the kind that doesn't require professional certification), I'd say the equation is

Engineering = f(Science) + f(Experimentation) + f(Product Re-evaluation) + f(Specification)

Another type is:

Engineering = f(Science) + f(Laws) + f(Standards) + f(Inspections) + f(Accreditation)

Yet another type is:

Engineering = f(choo) + f(choo)

One definition of engineering I read a while back (and haven't been able to find again) was something to the effect of "engineering is the application of science to produce devices to perform useful work" so by that definition, I'd agree with you.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.