Comment on 339 Bytes of Responsive CSSComments−caillou7yThere is a small accessibility problem with the CSS presented on this page. The author set `text-decoration: none;` on the links, relying only on color to identify them. This should be avoided.C.f. https://accessibility.oit.ncsu.edu/it-accessibility-at-nc-st...−gb7yAlso related, the link/background colour combination fails WCAG contrast guidelines.−arkokoleyOP7yVery interesting point. My thoughts were along the lines of "underlined links look bad". I did not realise this could be an accessibility problem.
Comments
There is a small accessibility problem with the CSS presented on this page. The author set `text-decoration: none;` on the links, relying only on color to identify them. This should be avoided.
C.f. https://accessibility.oit.ncsu.edu/it-accessibility-at-nc-st...
Also related, the link/background colour combination fails WCAG contrast guidelines.
Very interesting point. My thoughts were along the lines of "underlined links look bad". I did not realise this could be an accessibility problem.